Democrats |
||
Saturday, May 17, 2003 | ||
I've been reading a bit about commons, prompted by wanting to understand Lawrence Lessig's use of the term in his notion of the Creative Commons. A common thought runs through most of the current discussion of the information/knowledge economy. That thought is how best to advance creative innovation. It resolves into a question: does a centralized system or a decentralized one promote innovation better? In the communications sector, the models for the centralized system is the old AT&T monopoly. The end-to-end, stupid network design of the Internet is the model for the decentralized. On The Agonist today was a reference to an article by Pat Buchanan on The American Conservative site where he calls Colin Powell the true conservative hier to the Reagan/Eisenhower agenda. My reaction was:
Well, maybe the difference is between the two network models. Republicans, whether interventionist or isolationist, are in favor of central control by corporate interests. Democrats favor government intervention to ensure the flourishing of the end to end model. Republicans tend to see a rivalrous world and Democrats tend toward nonrivalrous models? More as I think it through. 19 May 2003 Doesn't it suck that such a question is germane? |
||
© 2002, 2003 satterlee.com |